Single tactic systems hold little promise for codling moth control.
Table 1 provides a comparison of a control system based
on conventional insecticides and alternative pest management systems relying
on multiple tactics for the control of fruit pests with the codling moth
as the primary target. Research has demonstrated the effectiveness
of highly integrated pest management programs which result in fresh-market-quality
fruit produced with very few chemicals (Prokopy 1990). The careful consideration
of multiple pest/multiple tactic interactions allows growers to apply sufficient
control pressure on key pests without interfering with the natural regulation
of sporadic and secondary pests. Once interference between tactics
has been diminished, an accumulation of beneficial insects develops in
the orchard. In an orchard where a variety of tactics—including selective
pesticides—are used, sampling reveals a rich community of arthropods and
a variety of second, third, and fourth level trophic interactions (Croft
& Hull 1983, 1992). Also, natural enemies and other factors often
provide complete biological control of phytophagous mites.
Biotic imbalances can ensue from use of these chemicals leading to outbreaks
of other pests, particularly mites. Once interference among pest
control tactics is reduced to a minimum, the orchard begins to function
as a complex, multi-trophic ecosystem. Small perturbations, slight
changes in the initial conditions of seasonal cycles, and subtle fluctuations
in the rates of change in the orchard subsystems can be magnified in the
agroecosystem and give rise to significantly different outcomes.
The challenge is to identify and manipulate these subtle interactions to
the benefit of the grower. In light of increasing incidences of field
failures due to organophosphate resistance and the cross resistance that
extends to almost all alternate insecticides, it is critical that more
diversified IPM systems be used for control of codling moth.
Efforts to integrate methods, such as mating disruption, microbials, and
selective insecticides (e.g., insect growth regulators), cultural controls
(such as destruction of unharvested fruit) and biological control by egg
parasitoids, are being tested as components of IPM for codling moth (Croft
& Giliomee 1993). Use of much more diversified control systems
for this pest, which will include a number of resistance management components,
such as monitoring methods, are essential for the future of the region's
pome fruit industry.
Pests |
Conventional Control Methods |
Alternative Tactics |
| Codling moth | Guthion (Azinphosmethyl) | Pheromone (mating disruption) |
| Imidan, Lorsban, Penncap | Insect Growth Regulators | |
| Insect Growth Regulators | Biological Controls | |
| Sterile Male Technique | ||
| Leafrollers | Mineral oils | |
| Leafrollers | Lorsban, Penncap, | Bacillus thuringiensis |
| Pyrethroids, IGRs | Pheromone (mating disruption)
IGRs |
|
| Biological Controls | ||
| Aphids | Thiodan, Dimethoate | Insecticidal Soap |
| Pyerthroids | Biological Controls | |
| Leafhoppers | Sevin/Thiodan | Insecticidal Soap |
| Biological Controls | ||
| Leafminer | Vydate | Biological Controls |
| Scale | Oil, Lorsban, Supracide | Mineral oils |
| Misc. Lepidoptera
(cutworms, armyworm, tent caterpillars, etc.) |
Lorsban, Thiodan, Sevin | Bacillus thuringiensis |
| Biological Controls | ||
| Insect Growth Regulators | ||
| Sucking
Bugs (Campylomma,
lygus, stink bugs) |
Lorsban,
Dimethoate,
Carzol, Thiodan, Pyrethroids |
Insorganic sulfur |
| Biological Controls | ||
| Selective acaricides | ||
| Insecticidal soaps | ||
| Mites | Acaricides | Selective Acaricides
Biological Control |
| Pear psylla | Oil, Pyrethroids | Biological Control |